Thursday, September 29, 2011

Who is Rahul Gandhi ?

Dr Subramanian Swamy on RAHUL GANDHI
Excerpted from
http://gandhiheritage.org/

Rahul Gandhi – Lies on Education

.......Why is he (Rahul Gandhi) registered as Rahul Vinci Gandhi in Rolings college in Orlando or some place like that, which is a Christian missionary college.  Why did he not register himself as Rahul Gandhi?  Why did he claim he has M.Phil from Cambridge.  University of Cambridge has no record of any thesis, you cannot get M.Phil without any thesis.  How did he claim that?  I asked university of Cambridge to give me a letter.  The university said we know what you did with Sonia Gandhi letter, we are not going to give any more letters.  So, they decline to give me any letter.   I went to the library where all thesis are kept.  His name is not there.   Not there as a student also.  Not there in registrar’s office as student who took exam, in the year he mentioned, 1995.   So, why did he claim.  He first claimed he went to Harvard.  Yes, he went to Harvard, in the sense, when Rajiv Gandhi was Prime Minister, Indujas gave 11 million dollars to  Harvard Medical School  and on donor’s quota and Harvard has this quota, but once you enter, you have to compete,  in three months, Harvard said we don’t think you belong here.  So, he dropped out.  Now, he doesn’t use the word Harvard.  Unfortunately for him, some one in politics like me has long standing connection with Harvard.  Why you tell lies like this?  Because in our country we respect education.   So, you tell a lie about education.   All of us work hard, to pass examination and get a degree,  these guys don’t do anything, and they put themselves as educated.

Rahul Citizenship

Is Rahul a citizen of India?   He is born in India.  But the Italian law says that if your mother is Italian citizen at the time of your birth,  which in 1970, which time Sonia Gandhi was a citizen (of Italy),  then you automatically become a citizen of Italy.   And law in India says, you cannot be a citizen of India, unless you renounce the citizenship of another country.  Rahul Gandhi never renounced that citizenship because you are required by the law to declare  and give  a certificate to  Italian government that I have renounced that citizenship.  In fact, he uses a Italian passport by the name of Rahul Vinci,  Any time tomorrow, the Government comes that does not have the sychophants or those who are blackmailed by them,  then you can say that Rahul Gandhi also, you are not a citizen of India.  One of the things they have secretly kept, but that has gottenout now, is that Rahul Gandhi has gotten admission into ?? college on two grounds.  A) He is a Christian, in record and B) he is a marksman rifle shooter.   So, on sportsmen quota he got admission, not on grades.   How did he have to do that.  He could not pass hindi exam and he is representing the state of Uttar Pradesh.

This is the person who needs to be shown that he has nothing to do with Gandhi.  Gandhi was a man who was a barrister,  earned a name as a lawyer of south Africa, gave it all away for the country,  then if Rahul is using that name, you have a right to say, you are an imposter,  you don’t belong here.  (Claps).

Rahul Gandhi arrested by FBI

Rahul Gandhi was arrested at Boston airport.  He had 160,000 dollars in cash.  In united states, you cannot enter with more than 10,000 dollars without declaring it.  He didn’t declare and got caught.  He had with him a girlfriend by name Veronique Cartelli, citizen, passport holder spain, father Colombian.  Cartelli, means drug mafia.   And something else is there, which has not been identified.  27th September, 2001, they have SPG, like a royal family they have SPG cover. SPG said he is son of former Prime Minister and FBI said we don’t care.   It is the law.  Nine hours they kept.  Government of India intervened,  Condelezza Rice was told this will affect Indo-US relationship,  and then the FBI was told to let him go.  FBI registered a FIR or equivalent of FIR,  I don’t know what they call here, criminal case or whatever,  and was told anytime we want we can call you and you can go.  They let him go.  My friends here try to get information using freedom of information act to FBI and FBI said they will give his records, provided we get no objection certification from Rahul Gandhi because it is his personal records.   That’s the law.  So, I wrote a letter to Rahul Gandhi.   If you have nothing to hide, give us the permission.   He never replied.  Everybody knows.  This is in record.  Nothing to hide.  160,000 dollars in cash, carry such cash for what for? 

Rahul Gandhi – living with his girl friend

Don’t we think we have right to know if Rahul Gandhi is married or not?  In his house in Tughlak lane,  there is a foreign woman there.  Her name is Veronique Cartelli.   Is he married to her or not married to her?   Or is he living with her?   Can he not make that public?  What would the Indians think.  Rajiv Gandhi wife a foreigner.  Rahul Gandhi wife a foreigner.  Can’t  he find Indian girls at all?  And what were the antecedents of Veronique?   Daughter of drug mafia.  So,  we need to know.  Even in marriages,  we need to know.  Accountability in India is one can go to village and find out everything about me.  When you have a foreigner, you have to be doubly careful.  That should be doubly watched.

Read More
http://gandhiheritage.org/

Source - http://vivekajyoti.blogspot.com/2011/04/rahul-gandhi-on-corruption.html

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

Haunted House

Yet another ghost has jumped out of the attic after lying dormant for years and slapped the UPA Government in the face, sharply enough to leave it red-faced. Last November, the 2G spectrum scandal frightened the Congress and the Government badly enough after spending three years as a non-issue. Now, a scam that seemed to have been buried by the General Elections - the bribing of MPs for votes in Parliament that kept the UPA in power on July 22, 2008-has been resurrected by a WikiLeaks document that reported an American diplomat being shown Rs 50 crore in a treasure chest to buy MPs for the UPA.

A TV grab of MPs displaying cash in Parliament during the no-confidence vote on July 22, 2008.

Phantoms from the past have turned the Congress into a haunted house. The Opposition used the WikiLeaks cable to force the Government into a debate which turned out to be a fine example of parliamentary democracy. The star was a spirited Opposition that had the Government on edge, but the treasury benches fought back valiantly. A fiery Sushma Swaraj held sway in Lok Sabha while the erudite Arun Jaitley led the charge in Rajya Sabha. Swaraj used both logic and poetry to disarm the prime minister. "Tu idhar udhar ki na baat kar, yeh bata ki qaafila kyun loota; humein rahzanon se gila nahin, teri rehbari ka sawaal hai (Don't talk hearsay, tell us why the caravan was looted; we have no grouse against dacoits, but it is a question of your leadership)." In his reply, Manmohan Singh said he was no match for Swaraj's oratorical skills but went on to quote another couplet, "Maana ki teri deed ke qaabil nahin hoon main; tu mera shauq tou dekh, mera intezaar tou dekh (I understand that I am not worth your gaze; but have a look at my keenness, have a look at my anticipation for you)." The prime minister took on the Opposition point by point, couplet by couplet. He succeeded in restoring the initiative by the end of debate.

Swaraj also rebuked the prime minister for distancing himself from any crisis that overtook his Government. "Agar aapko kuch bhi nahi pata, toh aap PM kyun hain? (If you don't know anything, then why are you the PM?)" she asked. While defending the Government on the damaging WikiLeaks cable, Telecom Minister Kapil Sibal brought up another cable that questioned senior BJP leader L.K. Advani's opposition to the nuclear deal. Even Congress President Sonia Gandhi made a rare intervention when BJP leader Yashwant Sinha mocked at the Government, asking, "What was at stake? Apart from the Government and its longevity, what was at stake was the Indo-US nuclear deal." At this point, Sonia intervened, saying, "They used to say the same about your Government." She, too, was referring to the WikiLeaks cable that talked of Advani's soft stance on the nuclear deal.

For the first time, 10 Janpath had been linked to allegations of bribery. The WikiLeaks cable that mentioned Rs 50 crore in a chest also referred to Satish Sharma, a close confidant of the Gandhi family, as the man trying to buy MPs for the Congress. "These are not WikiLeaks but WickedLeaks," said former Samajwadi Party (SP) leader Amar Singh. 

PM Manmohan Singh spirited performance recovered the initiative for the UPA in Parliament.
If there was one reason why the Opposition should stop disrupting the Parliament, then this was it. Substantial argument and rhetorical flourish dominated the debate on the the cash-for-votes scandal. The CPI(M)'s Gurudas Dasgupta warned the Congress that "destiny has been kind to them but history will be cruel". When NCP leader Sharad Pawar tried to intervene, Dasgupta chided him saying, 'Pawarji, you have always been so docile. Why are you being sensitive now?" At the end of the debate, the prime minister replied, "I would like to make it clear once again that none from the Congress or the Government indulged in any such unlawful act during the trust vote in 2008. We have not been involved in any such transactions and we have not authorised anyone to indulge in such transactions." 

What precisely happened between July 21 and 22, 2008? Will its echoes and implications haunt the Congress in the manner of 2G, and before that, Bofors? 

The shortage (of votes) is covered by retail purchase of parliamentarians. It is universally believed now that corruption will follow Newton gravitational laws. It does not spread at the grassroots, it starts from the top, says leader of opposition in Rajya Sabha, Arun Jaitley.

The plan to expose the Manmohan Singh Government was put into motion by a Jaipur-based wheelerdealer with BJP links called Suhail Hindustani. During Atal Bihari Vajpayee's government, he had latched on to then Union minister, Shahnawaz Hussain, and made his contacts with second-rung national leaders and their networkers. Soon after the Left withdrew support on July 9, 2008, Hindustani says he started getting calls from various middlemen asking him if he had any "plots for sale". This meant, Hindustani explains, whether he had MPs who could be bought for the trust vote. "I asked them, kitna ka kagaz lagega? (How much are they worth?)" The figures surprised Hindustani. 

He decided to investigate further and called S.P. Gupta, a now retired IAS officer from Haryana cadre, whom Hindustani describes as a close confidant of Haryana Chief Minister Bhupinder Singh Hooda. Gupta immediately dropped in for a cup of coffee at Delhi's India Islamic Centre and asked him for a list of MPs. He said that he would introduce Hindustani to both Hooda and Ahmed Patel. Later that day, Hindustani ran into Uday Pratap Singh, an SP leader, at the Islamic Centre. Hindustani then decided to tap into Amar, for it was speculated that the then SP leader was busy mustering numbers to help the UPA. Uday Pratap said that while he had no access to Amar, he could introduce Hindustani to another SP MP, Rewati Raman Singh, who had access.

I want to say with great confidence that there is no video or audio of me (in sting operation). I am not in WikiLeaks or in the Tata-Radia tapes. These are not WikiLeaks but WickedLeaks, says former SP leader, Amar Singh.

This is, Hindustani says, when his conscience stepped in. "It's a fight for power. Wherever systems are weak, people come to rob," he told INDIA TODAY. The way he saw it, a vote for the nuclear deal would be a vote for America against India's national interests. So he called Advani's residence and claimed that as many as 15 BJP MPs had been targetted by the Congress as "vulnerable". Hindustani was asked to get in touch with one of Advani's key aides, Sudheendra Kulkarni. Hindustani gave him the list of MPs and said, "Apne MPs ko bacha lo (Save your MPs). Horse-trading is on full swing and I have been offered money to take some BJP MPs in their camp." Kulkarni says, "I have known Hindustani as a sincere activist, so there was no need to doubt his claim." He asked him, "Aapki pahunch kahan tak hai? (How far is your reach?)" The glib Hindustani replied, "Right up to Ahmed Patelji and Thakur Amar Singhji." Kulkarni then got in touch with other BJP leaders such as Advani, Jaitley, Ananth Kumar, Shivraj Singh Chouhan and Swaraj. It was then that the idea of conducting a sting operation was hatched. On the morning of July 21, Jaitley told Kulkarni that CNN-IBN, a private news channel, had agreed to conduct this sting operation and put it on air. Three BJP MPs-Ashok Argal, Mahavir Bhagora and Faggan Singh Kulaste-were shorlisted as the bait. Their names were already on the list of "vulnerable MPs" who could switch over. Hindustani then sent out feelers that he had three MPs who were in the market. He says he met Congress leader Buta Singh's son, Lovely, along with another person Aman Arora at Hotel Claridges. Over "vegetable soup", Hindustani told them he had three "plots for sale". He claims that Lovely immediately whipped out his cellphone and fixed a meeting at Patel's residence for 7.30 p.m. that day (July 21, 2008). A jubilant Hindustani then alerted Kulkarni.

The CNN-IBN team, however, could not get its act together in time, so Hindustani rescheduled the meet. This, at least, is Hindustani's version. He went to Hotel Le Méridien, which is a stone's throw from Parliament. Only two of the BJP MPs, Bhagora and Kulaste, went to this meeting. The elusive Patel was not there, so his name could have been a chimera. Instead, Hindustani, who had accompanied these MPs, says former Arunachal Pradesh chief minister Gegong Apang's son, Maharashtra Congressman Kripashankar Singh and the then Jharkhand chief minister Madhu Koda could be seen in the lobby. It could not be coincidental that all these leaders were present at a time when there was talk of some Jharkhand Mukti Morcha MPs and one Opposition MP from the Northeast being wooed by the Congress to vote for the deal.
"Wahan ka mahaul aise tha jaise qatl ki raat hoti hai (the atmosphere was very charged that night)," Hindustani later told the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) headed by K.C. Deo that probed this case. But the CNN-IBN tapes had no footage of any of these leaders at the hotel. Siddharth Gautam, who was then working with the news channel, had then denied the presence of any Congress leader at the hotel that day.
After this failed attempt to nail Patel, the group reconvened and Kulkarni asked Hindustani to get in touch with Rewati Raman. Hindustani got him to meet the group at Argal's residence at 4 Ferozshah Road. The sting cameras were in place when Rewati Raman arrived. He wanted the group to meet Amar that very night but the MPs demurred because they knew that they had to first get their cameras in place outside Amar's residence. In the tapes that CNN-IBN handed over to the JPC, Rewati Raman is heard telling the MPs, "I have not talked about the amount... We shall talk about the amount in front of you only... How can I talk? How do I know what you have?" Hindustani recalls with a laugh, "He could not understand why we were not going to Amar Singhji's residence that night itself. He kept asking, what are you scared of? Woh aapko kha nahin jayenge (He wont eat you)." Funnily enough, Argal says Gautam had warned the MPs against visiting Amar at night, saying that he might kidnap them. 

The very next day, on the morning of the trust vote, Hindustani got a call from Rewati Raman telling him to send the MPs to Amar's residence. Only Argal and Kulaste went along with Hindustani. The trio travelled in a white Zen. They had no hidden cameras on them as Gautam was worried that Amar would catch on. So the only cameras that were present were left outside Amar's house. The CNN-IBN tapes show the Zen going in and out of the house but since the car had tinted glasses, the faces of the passengers could not be seen. The CNN-IBN reporter told the JPC that he could not see the faces of any of the passengers except that of Hindustani.

Did we then enjoy the confidence of Lok Sabha? Yes, 275 to 256. Did we enjoy the confidence of the people? Yes,we came back with 201 seats and you were reduced to 118 seats, says home minister P. Chidambaram.

Hindustani recalls that Amar made a very gracious host, offering them dry fruits and cold drinks. "He walked shehanshahi tareeke se (in a royal manner)," says Hindustani. This is where the stories vary. According to Hindustani, Amar immediately picked up his phone and said, "Do kamal vaale aaye hain. Mere saamne baithe hain. Direct hain (Two people from the lotus party (BJP) have come. They are sitting directly in front of me)." Hindustani says, "Putting the phone down, he told us that he had spoken to Manmohan Singhji." However, when INDIA TODAY asked Argal, one of the MPs present, whether Amar had spoken to Manmohan, he denied it saying Amar called Patel and made both Kulaste and Argal talk to him. "Hoon-haan ki baat ki, zyada nahi (He only hummed and hawed, didn't say much)," said Argal, when asked about his conversation with the person at the other end of the phone, who he believed was Patel. Argal admits that he had no way of verifying if it was indeed Patel. He adds that Amar offered them Rs 3 crore each though Hindustani tried to bargain for more. "He told him, aap Thakur ho, Marwari ke jaise kyon bol rahe ho? (You are a Thakur, why are you talking like a Marwari?)," recalls Argal, adding, "Amar Singh told us that had we come last night, the rate would have been higher as by this morning, they had got over 275 MPs."

Since the plan was to catch the money on tape, the MPs told Amar to send the token amount of Rs 1 crore to Argal's residence, using the waiting media outside as an excuse. Speaking to INDIA TODAY, Amar denies that this meeting ever took place. "You saw the tapes? On it, the reporter says about me that he is too smart to be videographed and audiotaped. Bad luck for them," he says. He also added, "The natural law of justice says in absence of any concrete evidence, every individual is entitled to the benefit of doubt. To my harshest of critics and most hostile political enemies, I humbly request the benefit of doubt."

When the cash arrived at Argal's residence, it was carried by Sanjeev Saxena, a man who Hindustani claims to have seen at Amar's residence earlier. He was accompanied by another man in a yellow shirt and the duo carried the money in cloth bags. After handing over the money, Argal says, Saxena made the MPs speak to Amar. The exchange of money was also caught on camera; there were 10 bundles of Rs 10 lakh each. The serial numbers were noted down.

It is the habit of the prime minister to blame others. If you do not know anything, then why are you the prime minister? asks leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha, Sushma Swaraj.

After this, the MPs transferred the money to two black canvas bags. "Since there was a buzz in Parliament that we had not shown up for the vote that day, the media was on the lookout for us. So we requested two former MPs to accompany us and carry the money inside Parliament for us," says Argal. Later, during the vote, the trio walked into the Lok Sabha and displayed the money along with allegations of horse-trading. Pandemonium followed, but the UPA ended up winning the vote. It was 275 votes in favour of the UPA and 256 against it. The seeds of the current UPA'S problems were sown in UPA-I's finest hour.

"It was decided that the CNN-IBN will air the sting operation while the debate over vote of confidence was on in Parliament. But CNN-IBN backtracked," says Kulkarni. He adds, "The very senior BJP leader (read Jaitley), who had approached the channel for the sting operation, said he had failed to make a right choice after the channel did not keep its word." Amar, too, had a dig at CNN-IBN. "There is an allegation that money changed hands there also. High time Mr Sardesai should come clean." Rajdeep Sardesai, editor-in-chief of CNN-IBN, later told the JPC that "the reason why we did not telecast these tapes on that day, or at that time, was we felt that we needed to crosscheck and verify all the information that was there".

There have of course been a spate of denials. Rewati Raman told the JPC that he was told that Argal wanted to meet Amar as he wanted to join the SP as its Madhya Pradesh chief, since Argal's seat had been lost due to delimitation. "I spoke to Amar Singh and told him that these people want to join the party. He said, they don't have a good image; we don't want to absorb them in our party," said Rewati Raman. Saxena has denied that it was Amar who handed him Rs 1 crore to deliver to Argal's house. Instead, he claims that "a person accompanying Suhail, who joined me in the car at Ashoka Road (enroute to Argal's house), gave me the bag". Home Minister P. Chidambaram told Parliament in the recent debate that Hindustani's role in procuring the money cannot be ruled out. "Doubts persist with regard to his (Hindustani's) role, if any, in arranging the money in question," he said.

Saxena has denied working for Amar, saying he worked for Shahid Siddiqui, then an SP MP (he is now with the BSP), at 8 South Avenue "where both Shri Siddiqui and Shri Amar Singh used to work". Amar does not deny knowing Saxena but says he was not a paid employee.

"The media has asked us why the JPC did not call either Amar Singh or Ahmed Patel for cross examination," says Deo. "But there was no prima facie evidence against them. Just because their name is mentioned in some conversations... There has to be some proof against them. There is nothing on the tapes, neither their faces nor their voices," he added. Of course, the strongest denial has come from Manmohan Singh, albeit three years later. 

http://www.sunnysolanki.co.in/Pages/HauntedHouse.aspx

Monday, September 12, 2011

Robert Vadra: Proxy Tycoon?

Fallout of the dwindling Dyarchy
Amidst the stench of corruption and malfeasance rising from the second political innings of the UPA coalition headed by Manmohan Singh but presided over by the Italian-born Sonia Gandhi comes a startling revelation – the unremarkable Robert Vadra, small time exporter of artificial jewellery and son-in-law of the Signora, is fast emerging as a virtual tycoon, with fingers in many industrial pies.

The revelations follow a public uproar over the outrageous loot of the exchequer in the Commonwealth Games and 2G Spectrum allotment scams, to mention only the most notorious. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and his immediate family; circle of relations on both his own and his wife’s side; and personal friends, are nowhere indicted in any scandal.

The Gandhi family has been tainted with corruption and nepotism for at least four decades. Recently, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal subtly revived the Bofors ghost by declaring that the late Win Chaddha had taken a legally banned commission on the Bofors gun deal, and hence owed the State a handsome sum as income tax dues! So while the Signora’s well-oiled protection machinery ensured that her countryman Ottavio Quattrocchi got away with the loot and that the Hinduja brothers did not suffer for their role in the affair, the ITAT decision ensured that the illegal gratification was recorded officially in the country’s legal history. It is a lesson in the limits of proxy rule.

And now, just a few weeks down the line, comes the news that Priyanka Gandhi’s fitness freak polo playing spouse is making strides in the real estate business, a sector riddled with nepotism and scandal as exemplified by the Adarsh housing scam in Maharashtra, which forced Ms Sonia Gandhi to urge Congress chief ministers to give up their discretionary powers in this area.  

It is pertinent that facts personally embarrassing to the Gandhi family are emerging on the heels of strong nudges to Dr Manmohan Singh to step down so that Rahul Gandhi, reputedly the born-to-be ruler of India, could receive on-the-job training and redeem his otherwise inglorious existence. But the Prime Minister is no pushover and during a recent interaction with select senior journalists over the Spectrum Scam, explicitly stated he had no intention of resigning (read being driven out) as he had yet to go the metaphorical miles before he could consider an exit. In other words, he would go when the government went, and not before.

That these signals have been understood can be gauged from the fact that Sonia loyalists directly and indirectly sharpened their attack on the Prime Minister immediately thereafter. Senior ministers have urged journalists to target the Prime Minister and his office for the sins of omission and commission in the Spectrum scandal. Although the exposé of the Niira Radia tapes revealed that some journalists had networked with Congress leaders close to Sonia Gandhi to get the Telecom portfolio for Andimuthu Raja once again in the UPA-II – and that Singh had no say in the cabinet formation – senior ministers strove to implicate the Prime Minister enough to make him quit in disgust while publicly mouthing platitudes in his defence. It was schizophrenia at its best.

Dr Manmohan Singh is made of sterner stuff. Like the now forgotten Yuri Andropov who collected a handful of aides to erode the hated Soviet citadel from within, the Sardar too seems to have a set of unknown loyalists. His political ‘guru’ P.V. Narasimha Rao – no one even knew they were acquainted with each other until Manmohan Singh was anointed Union Finance Minister! – had secret Hindu sympathies that permitted the unhindered removal of the Babri structure in 1992 and so tilted the scales against the Congress in Uttar Pradesh that the party could not return to power for over a decade at the Centre, and that too only in coalition.

No one knows yet if Manmohan Singh has a covert personal or political agenda. But it is near certain that he was legitimately offended, if not enraged, at being asked at the very height of his stature as leader of a rising economic power who was being courted as a statesman in the international area, to step down in favour of the Amethi non-entity, who cannot even speak cogently on any issue of national concern and tends to disappear when things get politically controversial.

Sun shines over Robert Vadra

Whispers about the financial rise and rise of Robert Vadra have been doing the rounds for some years, escalating during the Commonwealth Games, but there was no independent corroboration of the same. This growing eminence is obviously a concerted decision of the Gandhi family and its courtiers, but could not have taken place without the knowledge of Dr Manmohan Singh and many others in industry and government. Thus, as in the Radia tapes episode, there are many sources from which the news could have leaked and it would be impossible to impute motives or fix responsibility. What is pertinent is the timing – it coincides with concerted attacks on the Prime Minister.

Robert Vadra’s entry into the real estate business has been accompanied by a partnership with the country’s largest realty firm, DLF Ltd, a staggering feat by any standards (The Economic Times, 14 March 2011). Hitherto known for the export of faux jewellery and handicrafts, the 42-year-old Vadra quietly switched lanes in 2008, buying up land in Haryana and Rajasthan, a 50% stake in a leading business hotel in Delhi, and attempting to enter the business of chartering aircraft, a quantum jump that certainly merits an explanation.

Vadra seems to have floated a number of companies, some of which have received unsecured loans from the DLF group companies, including the Bombay Stock Exchange-listed flagship DLF Ltd. Readers may recall that during investigations into the Spectrum Scam, the CBI found that a number of non-entity (shell) companies had received and passed on unsecured loans that ended up in Kalaignar TV! It believes these were bribes received against the sale of spectrum at throwaway prices, and that the loans would ultimately be cancelled as ‘bad debt’ and the slate wiped clean. Thus, Vadra’s receipt of unsecured loans certainly merits a probe.

Sky Light Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. (wholly owned by Vadra and his mother Maureen Vadra) is a partner, along with DLF Hotel Holdings and others, in a partnership firm that owns the posh Hilton Garden Inn in Saket.

DLF’s generous loans to Vadra companies, some without collateral, include:
-        As on March 2009, Sky Light Hospitality had received unsecured loans amounting to Rs 25 crore from DLF Ltd.
-        As on March 2010, only Rs 10 crore remained. It was unclear from the statement of accounts if the rest was paid back or written off.
-        Sky Light Hospitality in turn loaned money to other Vadra-owned companies such as Blue Breeze Trading Pvt. Ltd, North India IT Parks Pvt. Ltd, Real Earth Estates Pvt. Ltd and Sky Light Realty Pvt. Ltd.

Knowledge of such unprecedented asset escalation naturally took the polity by surprise, though the main opposition Bharatiya Janata Party tried to play down the issue owing to the covert proximity of some top leaders with the Congress and Sonia Gandhi in particular. A pathetic argument was forwarded that the party should not target the “family members” of the Congress leadership, an euphemism for Sonia Gandhi, though such sensitivity was not extended to the India-born M. Karunanidhi, and anyway has no place in public life.

For the CPI-M, however, Robert Vadra’s successful entrepreneurship has come as a timely boon, and the party hopes to extract full mileage from the same during the forthcoming assembly elections in West Bengal and Kerala. Sitaram Yechury emphasized that there was a strong case for an independent inquiry into Vadra’s activities.

Ra(h)ul (da) Vinci

Any investigation into Robert Vadra’s entrepreneurial prominence must legitimately cover the coy attempts of his brother-in-law Rahul Gandhi to become a business magnate. Media reports about the Amethi MP are opaque and have been noted perfunctorily only because Gandhi was compelled to reveal the same in his affidavit before the Election Commission.

In 2002, Rahul Gandhi launched a consultancy engineering firm, Backops Services Private Limited, with an authorized share capital of Rs 25 lakhs, divided into 25,000 equity shares of Rs 100 each. Gandhi himself held 83 per cent shares in the firm; the other shareholders were close family friend and aide Manoj Muttu; Anil Thakur, son of Madhya Pradesh Governor Rameshwar Thakur; and Delhi resident Ranvir Sinha.

Gandhi holds a mysterious M. Phil degree in Development Studies from Cambridge University, UK, though nobody knows when and where he completed his graduate and post-graduate studies. To this day not a single person has surfaced anywhere in the world to say that Raul Vinci (his disguise) was his/her classmate at x y or z college. The then Cambridge Master Amartya Sen defended the degree while stoutly declining to give details. However, in the wake of the Saif Gaddafi Ph.D. degree scam, it may be safe to assume that a friendly London establishment “took care of” the academic credentials of the wanna be PM-aspirant.

Similarly Raul Vinci is supposed to have done a stint as financial consultant in London. No colleague has stepped forward to say where, and how good or mediocre he was at the job.

What now merits investigation without delay – and the Supreme Court must urgently look into the same – is how Rahul Gandhi took on the identity of Raul Vinci. The specious plea that this was done for security reasons will not wash: Benazir Bhutto’s son Bilawal studies abroad under his own name, as do the scions of other eminent families.
-        So how did Rahul Gandhi get the Raul Vinci identity?
-        Was he given a Raul Vinci passport by the Indian passport office?
-        If so, what are the names of the alleged parents of Raul Vinci and what is the place of residence given on the document?
-        Or was a passport issued by a foreign country? Does this mean that Rahul Gandhi enjoys dual citizenship of some European country, which is illegal in Indian law?
-        Where is that passport now and how often and where has Rahul Gandhi travelled on it?

On 21 March 2011, The Indian Express reported that some time prior to the 2009 elections, Rahul gave up his business venture, Backops Services Private Limited, to devote himself to full-time politics. It was by all accounts a modest venture, nothing compared to the phenomenal ascent of Robert Vadra. What is pertinent, however, is the suspicious overlap in Rahul Gandhi’s retreat from business and Vadra’s big time leap into the arena.
 
Wikileaks: Sardar - Signora Dyarchy in distress

The Wikileaks revelations regarding American interest and overseeing of the 2008 cash-for-vote scam due to the Indo-US nuclear deal could not have come at a worse time for Sonia Gandhi, who once stated that the deal was very close to her heart, but did not say why.

On 18 March 2011, Dr Manmohan Singh told Parliament he did not authorise anyone to purchase any votes: “I am not aware of any purchase of votes. Certainly, I am not involved in any such things.” One can readily believe that; it is totally out of sync with the known character of Dr Singh.

More pertinently, all the alleged fixers in the 22 July 2008 cash-for-votes episode are closely aligned with Sonia Gandhi and her family, which lends credence to the view that the nuclear deal was one of her ‘pet projects’ for unknown reasons. To recap the Wiki revelations briefly:

-        Gandhi family loyalist Satish Sharma’s aide Nachiketa Kapur told a US Embassy official that the four RLD MPs [actually three] were paid Rs 10 crores each to vote for UPA-1. [Ajit Singh denied the charges and said his party voted against the government in the no-confidence motion].

-        Kapur allegedly showed the US Embassy employee “two chests containing cash” in July 2008 [to assure him that the nuclear deal would go through] and said Rs 50-60 crores was ready for use as “pay-offs” to win the support of some MPs ahead of crucial vote of confidence following Left withdrawal of support on account of the Indo-US nuke deal.

-        Satish Sharma reportedly told the US Political Counsellor that “PM Singh and others were trying to work on the Akali Dal (8 votes) through NRI businessman Sant Singh Chatwal and others, but unfortunately it did not work out” [robustly denied by Chatwal].

-        Industrialist Mukesh Ambani offered to help secure Shiv Sena’s support.

-        Congress chief Sonia Gandhi might meet Jharkhand Mukti Morcha MPs.

-        Sharma told US embassy political counselor that Rahul Gandhi was speaking to National Conference’s Omar Abdullah.

-        A Congress insider reported that then commerce minister Kamal Nath was “also helping to spread largesse”.

-        The cables talk of the Left’s troubles with Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee’s refusal to quit and Ajit Singh’s success in getting Lucknow’s Amausi airport renamed after his late father Charan Singh.

-        Satish Sharma quoted to say he was trying to sow divisions in BJP by working on former PM Atal Bihari Vajpayee’s son-in-law Ranjan Bhattacharya.

-        Prakash Karat-Sitaram Yechury fault lines; Yechury admitted it was a mistake to have listed Speaker Chatterjee as a CPM MP in a letter withdrawing support, submitted to the President on July 8. A large group of CPM MPs unhappy at Karat for his “failed” strategy.

-        Regarding Left parties, cables say though defections were a possibility, communist party discipline remained strong and members were unlikely to vote with the government.

It thus transpires that the landmark achievement of the UPA in its first innings – the Indo-US Nuclear Deal – was the agenda of Sonia Gandhi, and she put her entire political weight behind it. Dr Manmohan Singh owned it as a good lieutenant and because he was himself pro-America, but he did not have either the money or the manipulative skills to push it through as happened on 22 July 2008.

Sonia Gandhi’s covert patronage of the deal also explains why CNN-IBN ditched the BJP and refused to air the secret tapes of the behind-the-scenes horse-trading as promised on 22 July 2008. Of course this does not explain why Mr L.K. Advani – who had previously made a veiled pledge to Senator Joe Liebermann regarding the deal – chose CNN-IBN to make the recording in the first place, when the party had its own equipment and talent to make the recordings and had done so successfully in another case.

Anyway, it is now evident that the undeserved elevation of the inane Rahul Gandhi has sundered the Sonia Gandhi - Manmohan Singh Dyarchy. Had it not been for an obliging BJP, the regime would have fallen by now.

This may still happen, as Sonia Gandhi may find it cheaper to cut her losses by sinking the government rather than risk the mild-faced Sardar using the state machinery to put the family in the dock, compelling the Supreme Court to order an investigation à la Hasan Ali.

If the government falls out of its own inner contradictions, the BJP will find itself in an unenviable position. 



Also see:


Source - http://www.vijayvaani.com/FrmPublicDisplayArticle.aspx?id=1687
http://leagueofindia.com/blog/robert-vadra-proxy-tycoon

Thursday, September 1, 2011

Religious War

There is a religious war on Hindus by christians and muslims

Annual Statistics report prepared by the Revenue and Endowment Board of Andhra Pradesh (released in 2008) which maintains the Statistics and Accounts of Religious institutions in Andhra Pradesh have the following list which is self explanatory. Christians are 2.3%, but the Christian data says they are 6% in India now is more terrorizing with their house to house conversion effort than the physical suicide bombing muslims. The Document can be easily procured by paying a minimum fee at the Endowment Board in Hyderabad. The Contents of the Documents is really shocking to any Hindu. Please Read the following.

Existing No. of Temples, Mosques and Churches in as on 31st March 2005.


District Temples   Churches   mosques
Adilabad 12,346   3,347   18,482
Ananthpur 14,008   4,892   9,328
Chittor 26,120   9,098   12,320
Cuddpah East 22,982   7,241   14,223
Godavari 8,220   12,123   9,230
Guntur 9,302   16,388   5,429
Hyderabad (Rangareddy) 13,144   3,204   15,203
Kakinada 7,203   8,585   5,274
Karimnagar 4,129   1,648   9,714
Khammam 5,210   7,203   5,922
Krishna 8,929   8,462   3,769
Kurnool 6,549   5,203   9,293
Machlipatnam 5,000(approx)   8,320   6,493
Mahboobnagar 3,299   3,128   7,235
Medak 6,302   3,203   3,234
Nellore 7,993   6,782   7,323
Nalgonda 6,882   2,412   5,239
Nizamabad 4,638   3,203   9,366
Prakasham 4,255   5,583   4,932
Srikakulam 7,339   9,879   2,140
Warangal 1,393   6,320   1,342
West Godavari 3,293   5,464   2,765
Vishakapatnam 6,430   3,203   4,203
Vizianagaram 3,891   3,100   3,500


What are the communal christians and communal muslims are up to in India. Christians have placed a Vatican spy Antonia Maino alias Sonia Gandhi in India and one of her christian chief minister in Andhra, the Samuel Reddy (full name Y. Samuel Rejasekhara Reddy and he is ashamed and hides his christian name like Yousuf Khan alias Dilip Kumar) is in the process of destroying Tirupathi. Chief Minister Samuel had already stopped the supply of fish for the free Asthma treatment given by the Bathini Goud brothers’ this year. (The fisheries dept used to supply lakhs of fish at Rs 7 per fish previously).

The muslims even after partition and occupation of Pakistan are breeding like rats in India and their numbers in India is more than that of Pakistan. Young muslims like the terrorist Haroon Rashid, a BTech from Aligarh Muslim University who joined HAL as a trainee with an intention to blow it up (Times of India 19-5-05) is the true face of muslims in India. What we should do about these two anti Indian communities?

Source - http://journey2truth.blog.co.uk/2008/11/18/there-is-a-religious-war-on-hindus-by-christians-and-muslims-5056459/